<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Has anyone used &quot;MirroPane&quot; glass?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">My local glass shops all have “MirroPane” glass for two way mirror type applications. Has anyone used this for our application? Does it work well?</p>
<p dir="auto">I believe this is the product: <a href="https://www.pilkington.com/en/us/products/product-categories/special-applications/pilkington-mirropane" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">https://www.pilkington.com/en/us/products/product-categories/special-applications/pilkington-mirropane</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.magicmirror.builders/topic/9939/has-anyone-used-mirropane-glass</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 04:17:57 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.magicmirror.builders/topic/9939.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2019 20:47:09 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Has anyone used &quot;MirroPane&quot; glass? on Sun, 03 Mar 2019 10:33:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The Mirropane available in the US (the one you linked to) with a light transmission of 11% and one reflective side of 68% is theoretical (and in my oppinion) a perfect fit for a magicmirror in normal lighting conditions (not daylight/sunny locations).</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.magicmirror.builders/post/53560</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.magicmirror.builders/post/53560</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[broberg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2019 10:33:03 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>