@magicghost our school doesn’t offer this untis feature for us, so i can’t implement and test it. youcan add this feature if you want/can do it
Read the statement by Michael Teeuw here.
Posts
-
RE: MMM-Webuntis
-
RE: MMM-Webuntis
i recently messed up the github repository.
If your last update was ~2 weeks ago you should be fine.
Otherwise your update may fail.You can get the most recent versions in this way:
There was no new feature in the last days. Only a more robust session management (hopefully) and internal changes.cd ~/MagicMirror/modules/MMM-Webuntis # Reset to match the remote repository git fetch origin git reset --hard origin/master npm ci --omit=devI’m sorry for any inconvenience!
-
RE: MMM-Webuntis
you can change the encoding in winscp to utf-8 then it should work again
-
RE: MMM-Webuntis
@magicghost yes, just define two modules. or maybe there are some fancy css hacks possible? i choose the first option for my two kids.
-
RE: MMM-Webuntis
this should work as minimum working example for your requirements.
{ module: "MMM-Webuntis", position: "top_right", config: { displayMode: 'grid', grid: { nextDays: 1, // today plus tomorrow = 2 days maxLessons: 0, // max lessons per day (0 = no limit) }, students: [ { title: "NAME", qrcode: "untis://setschool?...", //your qrcode }, ], } }, -
RE: obsession with modul checker
@htilburgs it‘s the original script. My script only tries to run this script locally on demand
-
RE: obsession with modul checker
@htilburgs i guess your modules are missing the minimal requirements for MagicMirror modules in the packages.json file.
I managed to lower the requirements…
-
RE: obsession with modul checker
@htilburgs the script looks if it is under an magicmirror/modules folder and takes this as root folder for modules.
otherwise it will take/opt/magic_mirror/modulesif your setup is different you need to adapt the script.
the script itself can be placed independently
-
RE: obsession with modul checker
@htilburgs now it should work for all installed modules
-
RE: obsession with modul checker
@htilburgs my main objection was to support the module development. so yes, at the moment it’s a per module check,