Github usage and module continuations

[crisvdn]

@sdetweil
First of all, thank you for responding. And awesome how you guys are maintaining everything.

Its totally understandable that developers abandon their modules. For longevity of this community its not so good. Scrolling through an entire list of 3rd party modules where you can only hope its maintained is a pain.

I think the best case scenario is that modules somehow gets absorbed by the main repository (compareable to ESP-IDF or how HomeAssistant is managing their integrations).
That way you don’t have seperate developers that have their responsibility (and even Github rights) to maintain the code. Single bus factor would be eliminated.

The problem with this is that other people have to take responsibility to maintain 3rd party absorbed modules. Even if that means that they don’t have primary knowledge of that specific module.

[sdetweil]

@crisvdn said in Github usage and module continuations:

I think the best case scenario is that modules somehow gets absorbed by the main repository (compareable to ESP-IDF or how HomeAssistant is managing their integrations).

yeh, I don’t think that will happen… we are a volunteer team, and have plenty of existing core issues to deal with… hundreds of additional modules just won’t be possible.

MAYBE 1 or 2 if they add value to the core.

I do the installer/upgrade/backup/restore scripts because it helps people get up and running… its a daunting learning curve. I’ve added support to try to cover all the abandoned modules during upgrade… but I can’t help on install of them, cause we don’t have a module installer…
there might be a path… but we don’t have a list… again another thing…

so, not specifc module related, but a module installer and a good module list (being the only way the installer would support a module) , and somehow to improve the usability of the config file… (I have have a module that presents a form, dynamically created, but developer styles can cause problems)…

long term those might help go in the direction you want to get to…

[sdetweil]

@crisvdn here is a link to the list work
https://forum.magicmirror.builders/topic/18092/automatic-checking-of-all-magicmirror-modules?_=1704465730999

i’ve just pinned it to the top of the Development section so it won’t get lost
(I couldn’t find it when I mentioned it the first time)

[KristjanESPERANTO]

@crisvdn Thank you for bringing up the subject. I’ve also been thinking about this for a while and have some ideas.

I try to keep the official module list up to date. I do reviews of modules and create PRs. Many are accepted, some are ignored.

I’ve started working on a new list of modules, and doing some rudimentary tests (you can see the result here). A few developers have already started work through the recommendations there. Even though the whole project is still in its infancy, but with that we have a process of assessing the quality of modules. Perhaps the whole thing will develop in the direction of module installer or app store. We will see. I would be delighted if you would take a look at the project and maybe join in.

There are already some great other approaches - for example the package manager mmpm or the “app store” in MMM-GoogleAssistant. Surely such projects could be combined on some level. I’m currently focusing on making my approach more efficient, then it’s time to automate it with actions.

[crisvdn]

@sdetweil said in Github usage and module continuations:

yeh, I don’t think that will happen… we are a volunteer team, and have plenty of existing core issues to deal with… hundreds of additional modules just won’t be possible.

After seeing @KristjanESPERANTO list of modules, seeing that there are over a 1000, I think it is definitely not worth it to push everything to one repository. Especially with duplicates and/or obselete modules.

Although, seeing the list of “default” modules be extended with 3rd party “verified” modules with proper continues integration (tests / and build workflows so it gets automatically build with every software update) would be great.

@KristjanESPERANTO said in Github usage and module continuations:

I’ve started working on a new list of modules, and doing some rudimentary tests (you can see the result here). A few developers have already started work through the recommendations there. Even though the whole project is still in its infancy, but with that we have a process of assessing the quality of modules. Perhaps the whole thing will develop in the direction of module installer or app store. We will see. I would be delighted if you would take a look at the project and maybe join in.

I haven’t seen this yet, this looks pretty good. Awesome to see that there’s a different visual list to find modules and see when its last updated.

As I said in the starting post, it would be nice to have a general sense of direction on how to improve the entire module base and it gets easier and there’s more overview whats available. But also make it easier for people to develop their module and have it gain traction across the community.

[danieeljose]

This sounds amazing as I found it very much useful and informative to be honest. Also, I have gone through this post which definitely helped me out a lot as a new member I am looking forward for more such discussion