MMM-temp-ds18b20 disable second sensor

briantogo

I am using MMM-temp-ds18b20, but would like to disable the second sensor. I am also trying to get rid of any headers, so only the temperature from the ds18b20 is showing. I’ve looked around the Developers window, hoping to find a way to hide everything but the one temp, and couldn’t find anything there. I’ve adjusted the config.js entry to show this;

{
       module: 'MMM-temp-ds18b20',
       position: 'top_right',
       config: {
            refreshInterval: 10, // in seconds
            displayMode: 'x-stack',
            sensors:[
                {
                    id: "28-021502d77aff",
                },
                {
                }
            ]
        }
    },

Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Brian

sdetweil

@briantogo

Remove this

                {
                }

So there is only one object in the sensors:[] array

briantogo

Thanks Sam, that did remove the second sensor, but there is still undefined section above the temp to get rid of, as shown in the attachment. Any suggestions on that?

sdetweil

@briantogo i think that is the header or label option

briantogo

Thanks Sam, I had already changed “headers” field to ‘inside’, and I like it’s size and placement. I had removed the field “label” under the sensor field hoping to remove it from the config. Now I have re-added the label field, but left it blank. Now the config.js looks like this;

sensors:[
{
id: “28-xxxxxxxxxxxx”,
label: “”
},

Now, it just displays an extra line above the temp reading. Is there a way to, let’s say, zero out or cancel that field altogether? Is there perhaps a word I could type in between the quotes like Null or Void?

Here is a screen grab from my mirror;

Thanks again,
Brian

sdetweil

@briantogo i dont know the exact answer, but using the developers window elements tab you can find the element
and set it to

display:none;

in css/custom.css

see the second link in my signature below for a quick guide on the dev window

sdetweil

@briantogo or move the header to label with no header

sdetweil

@briantogo did you get it fixed?