@fantasmic78 This should be possible with most modules. For example, I do this with MMM-JsonTable. The essential thing is that you use the same carouselId for both module instances.
Try it that way and let me/us know if you can’t get it to work.
Read the statement by Michael Teeuw here.
Posts
-
RE: MMM-Carousel - how to configure a module multiple times on the SAME page?
-
RE: display issue MMM-PublicTransportHafas
@jo-0 Okay, I still think that there is something non-standard with the data from the transport company, but we can investigate this further. Can you try the configuration
ignoreRelatedStations: true,in combination with both stationIDs? -
RE: display issue MMM-PublicTransportHafas
That is interesting. Apparently, the transport company defined the station ‘Am Zwingerteich, Dresden’ as a related station of ‘Postplatz, Dresden’. Please try
stationID: "975242"- this is another ID for ‘Postplatz, Dresden’, which is not related to ‘Am Zwingerteich, Dresden’. -
RE: MMM-OlympicGames
@sirfm
localehas to be direcly under config not in the module config: https://github.com/fewieden/MMM-OlympicGames/blob/master/.github/global.png -
RE: MMM-OlympicGames
@mlhote In the meantime it works also with node-fetch v2 for me, so an upgrade seems not to be necessary.
One assumption is that this occurs when you restart the mirror several times. Then the API is often queried in a short time and therefore you are blocked.
-
RE: Updated Olympics module?
Even if this is an old question: MMM-OlympicGames has recently been updated.
-
RE: MMM-OlympicGames
I also had the “invalid json response” problem. After I upgraded node-fetch to 3.x, it works fine.
-
RE: Need Help to organize
Which fork are you using? This fork from redxeagle seems to be the most recent. And the tables are displayed properly there in the screenshots. Unfortunately, I don’t have ioBroker devices, otherwise I would have taken a closer look.
Since no one else is responding here, I suggest you open an issue on the module’s GitHub repository.
-
RE: Fork creator rails against MagicMirror²
Oh, apparently you can’t set discussion topics to resolved. Or I can’t find the button for it ^^
-
RE: Fork creator rails against MagicMirror²
@karsten13
You’re right. I close the topic, then we can invest our time in other things :-) -
RE: Typewriter Effect for Compliments?
Okay, maybe a CSS approach will be easier for you then. Here is a howto you could also try: https://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/typewriter-effect/
Then you would “only” have to adjust your
custom.css.Feel welcome to let us know if you’re making progress.
I don’t know how familiar you are with CSS and JavaScript, but it can’t hurt to try :-)
-
RE: Typewriter Effect for Compliments?
Nice idea :thumbsup: :-)
I would start with
compliments.jsand this howto:
https://www.w3schools.com/howto/howto_js_typewriter.asp -
RE: Fork creator rails against MagicMirror²
We can’t know what kind of problems people have to deal with in real life. This does not excuse such behavior, but perhaps makes it more understandable.
To bring in a positive aspect: I am excited about the project and the community that has formed around it. Thanks to all who contributed!
-
RE: Fork creator rails against MagicMirror²
That even non-professionals can participate, makes MagicMirror² an exemplary community project. He obviously doesn’t seem to understand that.
All the effort he put into his fork could have been put into the project. That would be much more durable. Apparently, not all people are good at teamwork…
-
Fork creator rails against MagicMirror²
Sorry if this demontivates anyone, but I thought I should mention it here anyway. I stumbled across a fork of MagicMirror²: https://github.com/hangorazvan/MagicMirror2. Forks are basically not a problem, but the creator rails against MagicMirror² and the developers. I have not seen anything like this before :-(
based on MagicMirror² open source core framework unfortunately full of bugs from amateur “developers”… NO FUCKING THANK YOU FART OLD MAN!
Why is he forking if it’s so bad? And why doesn’t he make pull requests? Has anyone seen a pull request from him? Can he do that with the other license?
-
RE: `git clone` with `--depth=1`?
Ah, I didn’t know
--single-branchyet. But yes, that sounds reasonable too.Optimizing both (
git cloneandnpm install) would speed up the setup process, especially on slow machines. Since a simple user just copies the commands from the documentation, these changes wouldn’t complicate the process any further. -
RE: `git clone` with `--depth=1`?
That’s interesting, but I’m talking about the official documentation here :-)
-
`git clone` with `--depth=1`?
What do you think about adding
--depth=1togit clonein the documentation?Like this:
git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/MichMich/MagicMirrorThis would have the positive effect that users would only have to download 437 KiB instead of 19 MiB. The whole git history is not relevant for normal users, is it?
-
RE: `npm ci` instead of `npm install`
Okay, thanks for your opinions. I’ll use
npm cifor a while with my instances to gain more experience.I mark this thread as solved for now. Further opinions are of course welcome.