@kusselin said

One question: Do you have Netatmo installed and running at home as hardware and searching in MM…?

Nope, Netatmo not used by me …

Regards,
Ralf

@kusselin
Sorry I‘m out here because I do not have any experience with proxmox containers.

But in general, what Sam means is that your last log-output indicates that you had tried to start a seond instance of MagicMirror -which fails.
So I guess it is necessary to identify the primary instance and look for logs there .
What I have seen in addition but cannot justify: Your above output looks like you‘re working with root permission.

root@magicmirror-live:/opt/magicmirror# npm run server

As far as I remember correctly, this may causes difficulties as well - at least I remember to read something like this - context was different and it‘s possible that this doesn‘t apply to container-environments …

Good luck!
Regards,
Ralf

@kusselin Are there any error messages?
Check log as well as dev-console …
“Netatmo load” could be an indicator that module stucks in the middle of nowhere…

Regards,
Ralf

@chris47803 Ist es gelöst?

Mein Tip wäre gewesen, dass der LIKE Oprator case-sensitiv ist, daher “%nordrhein%” nicht gefunden wird, da es “%Nordrhein” heißen müsste…

• Wie hast Du es tatsächlich gelöst?

Gruß,
Ralf

@mischag
cool!
Congratulation!

Ralf

@mischag
This definitely sounds like a system not a MagicMirror problem.
You didn’t provide system information, so it’s hard to say anything.
What Pi? What OS? What screen?

I recently upgraded a (really old) Pi 2B and the (until upgrade) smoothly running touch didn’t work anymore - clearly caused by OS-upgrade.
The newer version introduced a completely different (touch) screen handling (without any warning, hint or message regarding this fact).
The axes and x-y positionings were mirrored. Your description sounds like that…

Regards,
Ralf

@xppaicyber said

Now you can customize the header text through the config.js file using the new header option:

Dear XppaiCyberr,
this is awesome!
Thanks a LOT.

Warmest regards,
Ralf

@sdetweil said in MMM-MQTTScreenOnOff - alternative to PIR:

fun stuff

yes, definitely!
Ralf

@sdetweil :-)
Dear Sam,

for all of your effort and all of your deep knowledge, all the kindness you are constantly showing

• for me you ARE the Master Mind!

THANKS for all of this!

Ralf

@olex.s @sdetweil , dear all,

As you know for sure I‘m really a fan of MMM-Pir - for (my) good reasons.
For a friend of mine I‘ve build a second mirror and because he is heavily engaged in smarten his home :-) I‘ve considered to use alternatives to a PIR sensor - because they are definitely unsmart…
With this I‘ve seeked for an integration for his homee solution which is not really capable for MQTT and randomly found a really cool device which I would like to share with you, guys!
This is not a „motion“ sensor but a real „presence“ sensor (radar based, not infrared) which even is able to identify a silently sitting person!
In addition this genius thingy talks MQTT, delivers the „presence“ status in a JSON object and so it is absolutely easy to use it with magic mirror and the herein presented module MQTTScreenOnOff.

This sensor is pretty expensive and invented and build by a small startup here in Germany 🇩🇪 .
You can find this sensor here.
The webpage is in German but for some reason the default UI is in English :-)
From my perspective this is defnitely worth the money (this is the fourth radar sensor I‘ve bought but the first one which is in the near of „working“)

The mqttTopic transmitted is: „tele/senvolon/STATE“ and the mqttPayloadOccupancyField is „presence“.
(The middle part is configurable in the sensor‘s UI, I‘ve decided to use vendor‘s name).

I REALLY miss the nice animation and the dimming of MMM-Pir but I‘m definitely thinking about to use this sensor as well.
(Which would be a major effort because my Mirror has an exact slot for the PIR sensor which is round and this sensor is squared so I will have to do some rough wood-work. On the other hand I MAY place the sensor away from the mirror on the opposite wall or in an other place and hide the hole from PIR sensor ….)

Nice MQTT module - thanks for this idea!

Warmest regards,
Ralf