UpdateDom not working

[sharmmoh1983]

@j-e-f-f But where it call this as all modules will be loaded simultaneously

[sharmmoh1983]

@j.e.f.f But where to call mentioned code as all modules will be loaded simultaneously

[j.e.f.f]

@sharmmoh1983 call it in your routine that responds to the DOM_OBJECTS_CREATED notification.

You can’t hide a module before its Dom exists. When this notification is dispatched it means all modules have started AND their Dom objects have been created for the first time. It’s the earliest opportunity you have to hide any modules.

[sharmmoh1983]

@j.e.f.f I am not generating DOM while start of the module but at voice command and this approach is working individually for the modules but not if all are coupled together So how come it is happening for individual modules

[j.e.f.f]

@sharmmoh1983 all the Dom objects for all modules are created automatically when MagicMirror starts. This is not under your control, even for your own module. Your getDom() routine is called when your module’s Dom object is initially created. This is why it is common to see a conditional in getDom() routines that returns something like a simple string (e.g.: “Loading…”). Once your Dom object has been created, you can call updateDom() at your discretion to make changes to whatever your module displays. If you don’t want your module to display anything, then don’t specify a location in the config for your module. If a location is specified, SOMETHING will appear there, even if you don’t have a getDom() routine.

You can’t make changes to another module’s Dom object, but you can hide or show it. However, you can’t do that until that Dom object is initially created.

When all the Dom objects for all modules have been created at startup, MagicMirror dispatches the DOM_OBJECTS_CREATED notification. By waiting for this notification, you can be sure that any module you attempt to hide will be hidden.

[sharmmoh1983]

@j-e-f-f It is kind of working now… I will test it thoroughly for two days and will revert in case of any issue

@j-e-f-f @Sean thank a lot for your prompt replies and efforts