Read the statement by Michael Teeuw here.
A magic mirror with touchinterface made from noble oak.
-
@yawns about 980mm by 570mm
-
@ij0n Is the touch frame on your picture?
-
@Cato yes, but only in its mounted state. here you can see it better: http://www.ijon.me/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/2016-10-15-22.43.57-579x1030.jpg
due to the mirror it appears to be double as thick as it is. The one I used was 9mm thick.
-
@ij0n Is it the black frame? Wow, hard to see!
Where did you order it? Do you have any movie of the touch functions?
-
@Cato I hadn’t replaced them with MMM-Wunderlist yet ;)
-
@Cato the touch feature isn’t THAT exciting to watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_kCp1SO-BQ … the IR Touch Frame was ordered from Defi-Tech.com via AliExpress, i.e. https://www.aliexpress.com/item/4-points-42-Infrared-Touch-Screen-frame-16-9-format-for-multi-touch-table-advertising-interactive/32582452717.html … the dimensions of the mirror where matched to that of the frame, and the display panel was centered behind it. Hope that helps :)
-
@berlincount Oh I think it WAS exiting because I thought the ir frame would be more visible. It’s hard to see on your mirror. Beautifull! :-)
-
@Cato said in A magic mirror with touchinterface made from noble oak.:
@berlincount Oh I think it WAS exiting because I thought the ir frame would be more visible. It’s hard to see on your mirror. Beautifull! :-)
I absolutely support this! I really like the way it is working
-
Ijon really did an absolutely incredible job :) I basically only gave him the technical parts and a VESA mounting bracket (http://www.pearl.de/a-PX2528-1256.shtml, with additional weight distribution via https://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B008KL739C/) plus my idea of how it’s supposed to stack together, and he took it from there; creating CAD drawings, selecting and sourcing the wood after discussing the type with me, always keeping me in the loop while working on it. I really enjoyed the cooperation and can highly recommend him!
For reference, this is what it looked like before: