Read the statement by Michael Teeuw here.
Additional Info for each module
-
Hello,
the last weeks i spended lots of time testing modules and so many of them are realy
great ( a few are grab ;-) ) but thats also ok. But during all the testing i found out that
its very very important to select the fitting hardware.
For example:
I develop on a Raspi P3B nice little machine and can handle a lot but not everything.
So this wunderfull modules MMM-voice i impossible to use on a PI much too slow.
On an old laptop with ubuntu it runs perfect.
I found this result fits too a lot of modules they work perfect ok fast cpu but not on a
simple one.
So my suggestion is:
If every module developer puts an information at the beginning of his readme to tell
the cpu where the module was developed and a recommendation.
like.
DEV-CPU: INTEL xyz with Ubuntu 16.04
REC-CPU: same or fasterI think this would keep a lot of people from getting unhappy with great module on a
slow cpu.So what do u all think about this idea???
Take care
Robert -
@tbbear said in Additional Info for each module:
So what do u all think about this idea???
I like this idea and I will comply with all future modules. :-)
My recent Hello-Lucy enhancement for MMM-voice does make mention of the cpu it was developed on and the expected latency when using a non-integrated USB microphone. :-)
