Read the statement by Michael Teeuw here.
Additional Info for each module
-
Hello,
the last weeks i spended lots of time testing modules and so many of them are realy
great ( a few are grab ;-) ) but thats also ok. But during all the testing i found out that
its very very important to select the fitting hardware.
For example:
I develop on a Raspi P3B nice little machine and can handle a lot but not everything.
So this wunderfull modules MMM-voice i impossible to use on a PI much too slow.
On an old laptop with ubuntu it runs perfect.
I found this result fits too a lot of modules they work perfect ok fast cpu but not on a
simple one.
So my suggestion is:
If every module developer puts an information at the beginning of his readme to tell
the cpu where the module was developed and a recommendation.
like.
DEV-CPU: INTEL xyz with Ubuntu 16.04
REC-CPU: same or fasterI think this would keep a lot of people from getting unhappy with great module on a
slow cpu.So what do u all think about this idea???
Take care
Robert -
@tbbear said in Additional Info for each module:
So what do u all think about this idea???
I like this idea and I will comply with all future modules. :-)
My recent Hello-Lucy enhancement for MMM-voice does make mention of the cpu it was developed on and the expected latency when using a non-integrated USB microphone. :-)
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login